Mitigating signal interference in a wireless network

ABSTRACT

A method, communication apparatus, and computer program product is provided for mitigating interference experienced by a wireless communication device, WCD ( 102 ). The interference is caused by signals transmitted by an interfering node ( 106 ). The communication apparatus determines information related to the interfering node ( 106 ). The communication apparatus selects, based at least in part on the determined information related to the interfering node ( 106 ), a WCD receiver configuration from a set of available WCD receiver configurations. The set of available WCD receiver configurations comprises i) a first WCD receiver configuration that mitigates only interference caused by physical signals transmitted by the interfering node ( 106 ) and ii) a second WCD receiver configuration that mitigates only interference caused by physical channels transmitted by the interfering node ( 106 ).

PRIORITY

This nonprovisional application is a U.S. National Stage Filing under 35U.S.C. §371 of International Patent Application Serial No.PCT/SE2014/050635 filed May 22, 2014, and entitled “Mitigating SignalInterference In A Wireless Network” which claims priority to U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 61/826,295 filed May 22, 2013, bothof which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to methods, apparatuses, systems, computerprograms, and computer program products for mitigating signalinterference in a wireless network, such as a wireless cellular network.

BACKGROUND

I. Interference in Wireless Networks

Inter-cell interference can be experienced by a wireless communicationdevice (WCD) such as a user equipment (UE) on the downlink and by a basestation on the uplink. To address this interference, Inter-cellInterference Coordination (ICIC), Enhanced ICIC (eCIC) and further eICIC(FeICIC) techniques have been developed in 3GPP. The eICIC and FeICICare time domain schemes that enable interference mitigation by thevirtue of resource partitioning in the time domain between an aggressornode that is a source of the interference and a victim node thatreceives the interference. These schemes partly or fully mitigate theinterference experienced by a WCD being served by the victim node or,more specifically, by the receiver of the WCD, which may receive both adesired signal from the victim node and an interfering signal from theaggressor node.

In the time domain eICIC or FeICIC schemes, the subframe utilizationacross different cells is coordinated in time through backhaul signaling(e.g., over the X2 interface between the base station of two cells). Thesubframe utilization is expressed in terms of a time domain pattern oflow interference subframes or “low interference transmit pattern.”Examples include Almost Blank Subframe (ABS) patterns. The Almost BlankSubframes (ABSs) are configured in an aggressor node (e.g., a macronode) and are used to protect resources in subframes in a victim node(e.g., a pico node) receiving strong inter-cell interference. A basestation that is serving a UE or other WCD can signal one or moremeasurement patterns to inform the UE about the resources or subframeswhich the UE should use for performing measurements on a target victimnode (e.g., the serving pico node and/or neighbouring pico nodes).

The schemes are also applicable to other specific types of deploymentscenarios such as CoMP, multipoint operation, multiflow operation,multi-carrier deployment, or any combination of these scenarios. Suchscenarios may exist in both homogeneous and heterogeneous networks.

II. Types of Wireless Networks

A. Homogeneous Network

A homogeneous network is a 1-tier system comprising a single layer ofradio network nodes (e.g., all nodes that are high power nodes (HPNs)such as wide area base stations serving macro cells). In anotherexample, a homogeneous network may also comprise only low power nodes(LPNs) (e.g., local area base stations serving pico cells). Whendifferent cells of a homogenous network are under similar levels ofload, a user equipment (UE) typically receives equally strong signalsfrom the serving node (which may also be a measured node) and from theclosest neighboring nodes, especially when the UE is located in theborder region between the two cells. Therefore, in a homogeneousnetwork, resource partitioning between serving and neighboring cells forthe purpose of inter-cell interference mitigation is not as critical asin a heterogeneous network.

B. Heterogeneous Network

The heterogeneous network comprises 2 or more layers where each layer isserved by one type of base station (BS) class or type. An example of aheterogeneous network includes nodes of different power classes, such asa set of high power nodes and low power nodes in a geographical region.A BS power class is defined in terms of maximum output power and otherradio requirements (e.g., frequency error etc.) which depend upon themaximum output power. The maximum output power, Pmax, of the basestation is the mean power level per carrier measured at the antennaconnector in a specified reference condition. The rated output power,P_(RAT), of the BS for different BS power classes is expressed in Table0.

TABLE 0 Base Station rated output power in LTE (FDD and TDD) BS classP_(RAT) Wide Area BS — (see note) Medium Range <+38 dBm BS Local Area BS≦+24 dBm Home BS ≦+20 dBm (for one transmit antenna port) ≦+17 dBm (fortwo transmit antenna ports) ≦+14 dBm (for four transmit antenna ports)<+11 dBm (for eight transmit antenna ports) NOTE: There is no upperlimit for the rated output power of the Wide Area Base Station.

A heterogeneous network, such as cells in a co-channel scenario, bringsmore challenges in terms of managing interference. The interference canbe addressed using the ICIC, eICIC, and FeICIC techniques describedabove.

II. Interference Mitigation

Some nodes include an advanced receiver (also called an enhancedreceiver) for performing interference mitigation. Examples of theadvanced receiver include an interference mitigation receiver,interference cancellation receiver, interference suppression receiver,interference rejection receiver, interference aware receiver, andinterference avoidance receiver, and some of these terms are usedinterchangeably. Interference cancellation or suppression by suchadvanced receivers can lead to the elimination of the interference, inwhich case the interference is completely cancelled, whereas in othercases the impact of interference on the useful signal is reduced. Theadvanced receiver can be used at a wireless communication device and/orat a radio network node (e.g. a BS, a relay, etc.) for improving thereception of the received, wanted radio signals.

A well-known example of an advanced receiver is a Minimum Mean SquareError Interference Rejection Combining (MMSE-IRC) receiver. An exampleof a more sophisticated advanced receiver is the Minimum Mean SquareError-turbo Interference Cancellation (MMSE-turbo IC) receiver, which iscapable of performing non-linear subtractive-type interferencecancellation, which can be used to further enhance system performance.Even the use of multiple receive antennas at a receiver can beconsidered an advanced receiver.

III. Mechanisms to Trigger Interference Mitigation of Physical Signals

For co-channel heterogeneous network deployment in release 11, a largecell range expansion (CRE) of up to 9 dB is supported. When a UE is inthe CRE region of a low power node (LPN), the received signal at the UEcan be interfered by, e.g., up to 2 strong macro aggressor nodes. Inthis scenario the received signal to interference plus noise ratio(SINR) (e.g., SCH Ês/Iot or CRS Ês/Iot) at the UE when the UE is servedby a LPN and is located in the CRE region of the serving cell can bevery low (e.g., down to −11 dB). In order to correctly detect receivedsignals, the UE in the CRE region has to mitigate (e.g., reduce orcancel) interference on certain physical signals (e.g., on a CRSsignal).

To facilitate UE interference mitigation of these physical signals, aradio network node can assist the UE by providing to the UE assistanceinformation, such as a list of assistance information (e.g., physCellID,antennaPortsCount, mbsfn-SubframeConfigList) as specified in TS 36.331.When a physical signal, such as a received CRS, carries assistanceinformation that is for a cell with CRS colliding with that of the CRSof the cell being measured or to be measured, the UE may use the CRSassistance information to mitigate CRS interference on the subframesindicated by the following parameters specified in TS 36.331:measSubframePatternPCell, measSubframePatternConfigNeigh andcsi-MeasSubframeSet1.

As another example, the CRS assistance information contains a list ofaggressor cells, their antenna port information, and also theirmulti-broadcast single-frequency network (MBSFN) configuration.

It has also been specified in TS 36.133 v11.2.0 that the UE shall meetthe measurement requirements when the UE is provided with CRS assistanceinformation, which is valid over the measurement period.

The reception of information from physical signals (e.g., CRS assistanceinformation) at the UE is used by the UE to perform the interferencecancellation on physical signals (e.g., CRS, etc.). However, inheterogeneous network deployment, the UE typically applies interferencecancellation on restricted subframes indicated in measurement patterns,which are signaled to the UE by the serving radio node via RRC protocol.

SUMMARY

This disclosure relates to a method performed by a communicationapparatus for mitigating interference experienced by a wirelesscommunication device (WCD), where the interference may be caused bysignals transmitted (e.g., broadcasted) by an interfering node. In somecases, the interference is caused by a physical signal from theinterfering node. In some cases, the interference is caused by aphysical channel from the interfering node. In general, a physicalsignal refers to a signal that is generated at a physical layer, andthat does not carry information from higher layers (e.g., does not carryinformation from L2 and L3 layers), while a physical channel refers to asignal that carries information originating from a higher layer.

The communication apparatus can facilitate the interference mitigationby selecting an appropriate receiver configuration to be used by theWCD. In some cases, the communication apparatus is the WCD itself. Insome cases, the communication apparatus is another node.

The same WCD (e.g., UE) may support multiple interference cancellationcapabilities in terms of types of signals (e.g., physical signal orphysical channel) whose interference at the WCD receiver can bemitigated. For example, a WCD may be capable of mitigating interferencecaused by a physical signal (e.g. a reference signal) and also becapable of mitigating interference caused by a physical channel (e.g., adata channel) transmitted by an interfering node. In some instances, theWCD may even be capable of mitigating interference caused by a pluralityof physical signals and a plurality of physical channels (e.g., a datachannel such as PDSCH, control channels such as PDCCH/PHICH, etc.).

While a WCD (e.g., UE) supporting multiple interference mitigation (IM)receiver configurations (e.g. a physical signal IM receiver and aphysical channel IM receiver) may use all or several receivers tomitigate multiple forms of interference (e.g., physical signalinterference and physical channel interference) all the time, thisapproach can be resource-intensive. More particularly, mitigating bothphysical channel interference and physical signal interference canincrease processing at the WCD, drain WCD battery and thus shortens itsbattery life, and increase WCD complexity and hardware cost (e.g.increased memory requirements). This approach does not lead toperformance gain (e.g., in terms of user throughput) in all scenarios.This approach may also require a network node to frequently provide theassistance information to assist the IM receiver at the WCD, which inturn may lead to complexity in the network node, increased signalingoverhead on the radio interference, and also increased signalingoverhead between network nodes for obtaining the assistance information.

This disclosure discusses methods enabling the use of the mostappropriate receiver configuration at a WCD (e.g., UE) under givenconditions (e.g., scenarios). For example, the selection of anappropriate receiver configuration can be based on a minimum set ofconditions, such as physical channel load and a relationship betweeninterfering physical signals.

In a scenario in which the physical channel load on the interfering nodeis low, the interfering node may generate a low or otherwise acceptableamount of physical channel interference at the WCD. In that scenario,the WCD can conserve resources by not using a receiver configurationthat mitigates physical channel interference. That receiverconfiguration may mitigate only physical signal interference, or may bea baseline receiver configuration that performs no interferencemitigation.

In a scenario in which physical signals from an interfering node andfrom a WCD's serving node are shifted in time or frequency, theinterfering node may generate a low or otherwise acceptable amount ofphysical signal interference. In some instances, the WCD can conserveresources by not using a receiver configuration that mitigates physicalsignal interference. That receiver configuration may mitigate onlyphysical channel interference, or may be a baseline receiverconfiguration that performs no interference mitigation. In someinstances, the amount of WCD resources needed for mitigating physicalsignal interference may be sufficiently low to allow the WCD to be ableto afford to perform physical signal interference mitigation even whenthe physical signal interference is low. The amount of WCD resourcesneeded for mitigating physical channel interference, on the other hand,may be sufficiently high such that the WCD should not perform physicalchannel interference when the physical channel interference is low.

In a scenario in which the physical channel load is high and thephysical signals from a serving node and interfering node are notshifted in time or frequency, the WCD may then use a receiverconfiguration that mitigates both physical channel interference andphysical signal interference. Although this receiver configuration mayrequire more WCD resources, the increased physical signal interferenceand physical channel interference may justify the use of such resources.

In one embodiment, there is provided a method performed by acommunication apparatus for mitigating interference experienced by awireless communication device, WCD, and caused by signals transmitted byan interfering node (e.g., a neighbor node). The method comprises thecommunication apparatus determining information related to theinterfering node. It further comprises the communication apparatusselecting, based at least in part on the determined information relatedto the interfering node, a WCD receiver configuration from a set ofavailable WCD receiver configurations. The set of available WCD receiverconfigurations comprises:

-   -   i) a first WCD receiver configuration that mitigates only        interference caused by physical signals transmitted by the        interfering node and    -   ii) a second WCD receiver configuration that mitigates only        interference caused by physical channels transmitted by the        interfering node.

In some instances, the set of WCD receiver configurations furthercomprises a third WCD receiver configuration that mitigates interferencecaused by both physical signals and physical channels transmitted by theinterfering node.

In some instances, determining information related to the interferingnode includes one or more of:

-   -   i) determining a relationship between a first signal transmitted        by a radio network node and a second signal transmitted by the        interfering node; and    -   ii) determining a load of the interfering node.

In some instances, the method further comprises the communicationapparatus determining information related to the WCD. The informationrelated to the WCD comprises one or more of:

-   -   i) information related to a location of the WCD within a cell,    -   ii) information related to an amount of power consumed by the        WCD,    -   iii) information related to the status of a battery that        provides power to the WCD, and    -   iv) information related to low interference physical resources        configuration.

The selecting of the WCD receiver configuration may be based at least inpart on the determined information related to the WCD.

In some instances, the communication apparatus is the WCD (e.g., a UE).

In some instances, the communication apparatus transmits to a networknode information about a first selection of a WCD receiver configurationfor approval or alteration by the network node.

In some instances, the communication apparatus transmits capabilityinformation to the network node. The capability information may indicatethat the WCD is capable of selecting between at least the first WCDreceiver configuration and the second WCD receiver configuration.

In some instances, the communication apparatus is a network node. Thenetwork node may provide to the WCD assistance information to facilitatethe mitigating of the interference by the WCD.

In some instances, the interfering node is configured to processinformation in at least a first logical layer that is a physical layerand a second logical layer that is a higher logical layer than thephysical layer. The physical signal includes a signal carryinginformation that originates from the physical layer. The physicalchannel includes a signal carrying information that originates from thehigher logical layer.

In one embodiment, there is provided a method performed by a UE (orother type of WCD), which is served by a serving node, for mitigatinginterference to a signal transmitted by a second node (e.g., the servingnode or a neighbor node), where the interference is caused by aninterfering signal transmitted by an interfering node. The methodcomprises:

(i) evaluating a plurality of conditions (such as, but not limited to,conditions related to a relationship between signals transmitted byand/or received from the second node and the interfering node);

(ii) selecting one of the following receiver configurations based on theevaluated conditions: a) a first receiver configuration for mitigatinginterference caused by one or more types of only physical signalstransmitted by the interfering node; b) a second receiver configurationfor mitigating interference caused by one or more types of only physicalchannels transmitted by the interfering node; and c) a third receiverconfiguration for mitigating interference caused by one or more types ofboth physical signals and physical channels transmitted by theinterfering node; and

(iii) using the selected receiver configuration for at least one of: a)mitigating interference caused by the interfering node to the signaltransmitted by the second node; and b) signaling the information relatedto the selected receiver configuration to the serving node.

In one embodiment, there is provided a method in a first node (e.g., aserving cell's serving node) serving a UE (or other type of WCD) andassisting it to mitigate interference caused by signal transmitted by aninterfering node. The method comprises:

(i) receiving from the UE information related to one of the followingreceiver configurations selected or recommended by the UE for mitigatinginterference:

-   -   a) a first receiver configuration for mitigating interference        caused by one or more types of only physical signals transmitted        by the interfering node;    -   b) a second receiver configuration for mitigating interference        caused by one or more types of only physical channels        transmitted by the interfering node; and    -   c) a third receiver configuration for mitigating interference        caused by one or more types of both physical signals and        physical channels transmitted by the interfering node; and

(ii) sending assistance information assisting the selected orrecommended receiver configuration of the UE, thereby enabling the UE tomitigate the interference from the interfering node.

In one embodiment, there is provided a method performed by a servingnode serving a UE (or other type of WCD). The method comprises:

(i) evaluating plurality of conditions related to a relationship betweensignals transmitted by and/or received from a second node (e.g., theserving node or another node) and an interfering node;

(ii) selecting, based on the evaluated conditions, a receiverconfiguration from a set of receiver configurations;

(iii) configuring the UE with the selected receiver configuration; and

(iv) sending assistance information assisting the selected receiverconfiguration of the UE, thereby enabling the UE to mitigate theinterference from the interfering node.

In one embodiment there is provided a method performed by a UE (or othertype of WCD). The method comprises the UE signaling to a network nodethe UE's capability for selecting any one of at least the above threereceiver configurations for mitigating interference according to one ormore conditions governed by one or more pre-defined rules and/orindication received from the network node.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A illustrates a network for performing interference mitigation,according to an aspect of the present disclosure.

FIG. 1B illustrates layers of a network node, according to an aspect ofthe present disclosure.

FIGS. 2-4 illustrate a flow diagram that shows a method according tovarious aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 illustrates a wireless communication device, according to variousaspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 illustrates a communication apparatus, according to variousaspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 illustrates a apparatus, according to various aspects of thepresent disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This disclosure discloses, among other things, a method of selecting,based on a plurality of conditions, one of several types of WCD receiverconfigurations (e.g., UE receiver configurations) for mitigatinginterference caused by an interfering node to a signal received at theWCD. The interference can come from a network node, which can be aserving node or a non-serving node (e.g. neighbor node of the servingnode). In the former case, multiple signals from the same serving nodemay interfere with each other. In the examples below, a discussion withrespect to a UE may apply to any other type of WCD.

In an embodiment, three main types of the WCD receiver configurationsare configured to mitigate, respectively, physical signal interference,physical channel interference, and both types of interference. Theyinclude:

i) a first WCD receiver configuration that uses a receiver type thatmitigates interference caused by one or more types of only physicalsignals transmitted by the interfering node;

ii) a second WCD receiver configuration that uses a receiver type thatmitigates interference caused by one or more types of only physicalchannels transmitted by the interfering node; and

iii) a third WCD receiver configuration that uses receiver types thatmitigate interference caused by one or more types of both physicalsignals and physical channels transmitted by the interfering node.

The selection of the receiver configuration can be based on a condition,such as on a load of the interfering node and on whether signals fromthe serving node and the interfering node are shifted relative to eachother. The condition can indicate, for example, that interference from aphysical channel transmitted by the interfering node is tolerable. As aresult, a receiver configuration can be selected to mitigate onlyinterference caused by physical signals from the interfering node. Insome cases, the mitigation of physical signal interference may consumeless resources (e.g., processing time, battery power) than themitigation of physical channel interference. In an embodiment, theselection is based on one or more additional conditions.

While some embodiments in this disclosure discuss a selection betweenreceiver configurations that mitigate different types of interference,in some embodiments no interference mitigation receiver configuration isselected (e.g., no advanced receiver configuration for inter-cellinterference mitigation is selected, and a baseline receiverconfiguration is selected).

Referring now to FIG. 1A, the figure illustrates a communication system100. System 100 includes at least: a wireless communication device (WCD)(e.g., UE 102), radio network nodes (e.g., a first radio network node(RNN) 104 and a second RNN 106), a core network 110, and a core networknode (CNN) 108. Signals from RNN 104 and RNN 106 may interfere with eachother, and this interference may be experienced at WCD 102. System 100may also include a third RNN 105, which may serve a target cell (e.g.,in handover situations). A WCD may desire to measure a signal from RNN105, and this signal may also receive interference from RNN 106. For thesake of illustration we can assume the following: RNN 104 is the RNN(e.g., eNB) that is currently serving UE 102 (i.e., RNN 104 is a servingnode); RNN 106 is a node (e.g., another eNB) that produces a signal (Si)that interferes with UE 102's ability to i) receive informationcontained in a signal (S1) transmitted by RNN 104 and/or ii) receiveinformation contained in a signal (S2) transmitted by RNN 105 (i.e., RNN106 is an interfering node).

The disclosure may also refer to a signal from a cell, such as a servingcell or a neighboring cell. The serving node operates in the servingcell to provide a useful or desired signal (e.g., user data, controlinformation, signals for performing radio measurements, etc.) to a WCD.The neighboring node operates in the neighboring cell and may outputsignals that are received at the WCD and that interfere with signalsfrom the serving node.

The method of selecting the WCD receiver configuration can be performedor implemented by WCD 102 or by network node 104, 106, 108, 105 or acombination thereof. For example, the network node can recommend ormandate a receiver configuration, or can consider a first selection(e.g., a recommendation) received from the WCD and transmit an approval,denial, or second selection back to the WCD. The selected WCD receiverconfiguration is then used by the WCD for mitigating the interference.

Network Node:

As used herein “network node” refers to any type of network apparatusthat has a transmitter for communication with a UE (or any other type ofWCD), directly or indirectly. For example, a network node can be radionetwork node (e.g., a base station) or a core network node. Morespecifically, for example, the network node can be a network node (e.g.,RNN 104) serving the UE, a network node (e.g., RNN 106) neighboring tothe serving network node of the UE, any network node in the radionetwork or in the core network in a wireless communication system inwhich a UE or any other WCD operates. Examples of network nodes are basestation (BS), multi-standard radio (MSR) radio node such as a MSR BS,eNode B, a network controller, a radio network controller, a basestation controller, a relay, a donor node controlling relay, a basetransceiver station (BTS), an access point (AP), a core network node(e.g. MSC, MME, etc.), O&M, OSS, SON, positioning node (e.g. E-SMLC),MDT, etc.

Wireless Communication Device:

As used herein, a wireless communication device (WCD), such as a userequipment (UE), refers to any type of communication device capable ofcommunicating, directly or indirectly, with a network node via a radioor other wireless interface. Examples of WCDs are machine type UE or UEcapable of machine to machine communication, PDA, iPAD, Tablet, mobileterminals, smart phone, laptop embedded equipped (LEE), laptop mountedequipment (LME), USB dongles, and any other wireless communicationdevice.

Interfering Node:

As used herein, an interfering node refers to a radio network node thatproduces a signal that interferes with a WCD's ability to receiveinformation transmitted by another radio network node (e.g., a radionetwork node serving the UE). An interfering node is also sometimesreferred to as an “aggressor node.” A UE that suffers from interferencecaused by an interfering node is sometimes referred to as a “victim UE.”

The disclosure describes, among other advances, the following methods:

i) a method performed by a communication apparatus (e.g., UE 102 ornetwork node 104, 106, 108, 105) for selecting a WCD receiverconfiguration;

ii) a method performed by the communication apparatus (e.g., networknode 104, 106, 108, or 105) for configuring a WCD to assist ininterference mitigation;

iii) a method performed by the communication apparatus (e.g., UE 102)for adapting receiver configuration; and

iv) a method performed by the communication apparatus (e.g., networknode 104, 106, 108, or 105) for signaling information related toreceiver configuration selection to another network node.

The Method of Selecting a WCD Receiver Configuration

The scenario for interference mitigation described herein is applicablefor embodiments throughout the disclosure.

The UE 102 illustrated in FIG. 1A is equipped with at least two types ofreceivers: receiver type A and receiver type B. Receiver type A iscapable of mitigating interference at the UE receiver caused by at leastone type of physical signal transmitted by at least one interferingnode. Receiver type B is capable of mitigating interference at the UEreceiver caused by at least one type of physical channel transmitted byat least one interfering node.

Physical signal and physical channel are described in 3GPP TS 36.211. Aphysical signal comprises of a set of resource elements used by thephysical layer but does not carry information originating from higherlayers. As FIG. 1B illustrates, a physical signal may be generated atthe PHY layer (i.e., Layer 1) of an interfering node, and does not carryinformation from higher logical layers such as Layer 2 and Layer 3. Aphysical channel, on the other hand, comprises of a set of resourceelements carrying information originating from higher layers (e.g.transport channel from Layer 2, RRC message from Layer 3, etc.).

Examples of downlink physical signals include a cell-specific referencesignal (CRS) or any other reference signal (RS), a primarysynchronization signal (PSS), a secondary synchronization signal (SSS),an extended synchronization signal (ESS), channel state informationreference signal (CSI-RS), demodulation reference signal (DMRS),positioning reference signal (PRS), multicast broadcast single frequencynetwork reference signal (MBSFN RS), etc.

Examples of downlink physical channels include a Physical DownlinkShared Channel (PDSCH), a Physical Broadcast Channel (PBCH), a PhysicalMulticast Channel (PMCH), a Physical Control Format Indicator Channel(PCFICH), a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH), a Physical HybridARQ Indicator Channel (PHICH), an Enhanced Physical Downlink ControlChannel (EPDCCH), etc.

The WCD 102 may have a plurality of receivers that are of receiver typeA and/or a plurality of receivers of receiver type B. For example, theUE may have three receivers of receiver type A, which may be capable ofmitigating interference from physical signals CRS, PSS and SSS,respectively. It may also have two receivers of receiver types B formitigating interference from physical channels PDSCH and PDCCH,respectively.

Referring back to FIG. 1, the UE 102: i) is served by RNN 104 andreceives signal (S1) from the node; and ii) receives signal (S2) fromRNN 105, which may be a secondary serving node or a neighboring node.The signal (S1) and/or the signal (S2) received at the UE is interferedby a signal (Si) transmitted by interfering node 106. The term ‘signal’encompasses a physical signal, a physical channel, or both.

The UE may receive signals from multiple serving cells, radio links, orother communication links (e.g., in carrier aggregation, coordinatedmultipoint (CoMP), distributed antenna system (DAS), etc.). A desiredsignal can be interfered by signals transmitted by one or moreinterfering nodes. The signal transmitted by interfering node is alsointerchangeably called an interfering signal, inter-cell interference orinter-cell interfering signal, other cell interference, non-serving cellinterference, other radio links interference, or other non-serving radiolink interference, etc.).

Conditions for Selecting WCD Receiver Configuration:

The selection of one of the multiple UE or other WCD receiverconfigurations (e.g., between a configuration that uses receiver type A,a configuration that uses receiver type B, a configuration that usesboth receiver type A and receiver type B, and a configuration that doesnot use an interference mitigation receiver type) can be performed bythe WCD, by a network node, or by both. The selection can use at least aminimum set of one or more conditions. The selection procedure can befurther enhanced by using additional or an enhanced set of conditions.

In instances where the network node selects the WCD receiverconfiguration, the network node can also configure the WCD with theselected configuration. In instances where the WCD may select theconfiguration, it may do so autonomously based on its own implementationprinciple or based on one or more pre-defined rules. A pre-defined ruleor WCD implementation principle establishes mapping between the receiverconfiguration and the relation between at least the minimum conditions(e.g., the relation between load on physical channel(s) and relationbetween physical signals in measured and interfering nodes). Onepre-defined rule can be implemented according to the mapping between thephysical channel load and the relation between physical signals asfurther expressed in Table 1 and elaborated below.

In an embodiment, the WCD (e.g., UE) or the network node selects the WCDreceiver configuration provided the WCD is capable of having at leastone receiver of receiver type A and one receiver of receiver type B. TheUE capability (e.g., its receiver types) can be obtained by the networknode explicitly by acquiring the UE receiver capability information fromthe UE or from another node being aware of the UE receiver capability.The network node may also obtain the UE capability informationimplicitly by observing the UE signal reception performance and/or radiomeasurement results reported by the UE. For example, if the UEperformance is above a threshold and/or radio measurement result isabove a threshold, the network node may infer that the UE is capable ofusing the receiver type A and the receiver type B for receiving signalsfrom first node under interfering signals received from another node(i.e., an interfering node). A general discussion of radio measurementsis provided later in the disclosure.

In one embodiment, the minimum set of conditions upon which the receiverconfiguration selection is based includes load of physical channels ininterfering nodes; and relationship between the physical signalstransmitted by the serving node and physical signals transmitted by aninterfering node. The minimum set of conditions are illustrated in Table1:

TABLE 1 Selection of receiver configuration based on minimum conditionsRelation between physical signals in Physical channel measured andinterfering nodes load in Shifted physical Non-shifted interfering nodesignals physical signals Low load Select 1^(st) WCD Select 1^(st) WCDreceiver receiver configuration configuration Medium load Select 1^(st)or 2^(nd) Select 1^(st) or 3^(rd) WCD receiver WCD receiverconfiguration configuration High load Select 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) Select3^(rd) WCD WCD receiver receiver configuration configuration

In the example illustrated in Table 1, the 1^(st) receiver configurationmitigates only interference caused by physical signals transmitted by aninterfering node (e.g., a receiver of receiver type A is used), the2^(nd) receiver configuration mitigates only interference caused byphysical channels transmitted by the interfering node (e.g., a receiverof receiver type B is used), and the 3^(rd) receiver configurationmitigates interference caused by both physical signals and physicalchannels transmitted by the interfering node (e.g., the receiver ofreceiver type A and the receiver of receiver type B are used).

The table shows that in instances where physical channel load on aninterfering node (e.g., load on a cell served by the interfering node)increases, interference from physical channels transmitted by theinterfering node may increase. For example, the interfering node may bea base station that transmits physical channels such as RRC messageswith UE's in its cell. As the number of UE's being served by the basestation increases, the base station may transmit more RRC messages,which may increase the physical channel interference experienced by UEsin neighboring cells that are not being served by the base station.Thus, as physical channel load in the base station increases, UEs inneighboring cells may use a receiver configuration that mitigatesinterference caused by physical channels transmitted by the basestation. For instance, a UE in a neighboring cell may have available the1^(st), 2^(nd), and 3^(rd) UE receiver configuration described above. Inresponse to determining that the physical channel load in an interferingnode is high, the UE may select the 2^(nd) receiver configuration or the3rd receiver configuration, which mitigates at least interference causedby physical channels transmitted by the interfering node.

The table further shows that in instances where physical signals from aserving node and physical signals from an interfering node are notshifted relative to each other, physical signal interference mayincrease. For example, a physical signal from a serving node and aphysical signal from an interfering node may be shifted relative to eachother in time or frequency to reduce interference between the twosignals at a receiving UE. In instances where the physical signals arenot shifted, the UE may more frequently use the 3^(rd) receiverconfiguration, which mitigates physical signal interference.

In the example illustrated in Table 1, the 1^(st) receiver configuration(which mitigates physical signal interference) may be selected even inconditions where physical signals from the serving node are shiftedrelative to physical signals from the interfering node. This selectionmay be used for situations where mitigation of physical signalinterference consumes a sufficiently low amount of resources. Forinstance, certain physical signals may have a signal pattern or powerspectral density that is much more static compared to physical channels.Mitigating interference from such physical signals may thus be easierand consume less processing time, battery power, or any other UEresource. Thus, in the example, a UE may be able to afford to use the1^(st) receiver configuration to mitigate physical signal interferenceat all times. Using the second receiver configuration to mitigatephysical channel interference, on the other hand, may consume moreresources because physical channels are more dynamic. Thus, it may bedecided that the UE should avoid consuming such resources, and shoulduse the 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) receiver configuration only when physicalchannel load in the interfering node is medium or higher.

In another example, it may be decided that the UE should furtherconserve resources by not using the 1^(st) receiver configuration whenphysical signals from the serving node are shifted relative to physicalsignals from the interfering node. For instance, if the physical channelload in the interfering cell is also low, the UE may use a baselinereceiver configuration that does not perform interference mitigation.

In an embodiment, other conditions may be used instead of or in additionto the physical channel load and relation of the physical signals. Theadditional or enhanced set of conditions may relate to one or more ofthe following: the UE's (or, more generally, the WCD's) location in acell; the UE's battery life, or the UE's power consumption.

Assessment of Conditions

The conditions that the network node assesses to decide whether to applyinterference mitigation with a selected UE receiver configuration arefurther elaborated in this section. A summary of the relationshipbetween the conditions used for selecting between possible UE receiverconfigurations is shown above in table 1.

Thus, the UE or the network node can assess certain conditions (asdescribed further below), establish a relationship between thedetermined conditions, and uses the mapping table 1 to select a receiverconfiguration and corresponding UE receiver type.

Methods in the UE and network node for determining the conditions, suchas physical channel load, the relationship between physical signals,location of a UE, and other conditions are described below.

Physical Channel Load or Interference Level in Interfering Nodes:

This condition can be determined through any metric that can indicatethe load from transmitting signals by one or more physical channels atthe one or more interfering node and/or signal quality received at theUE (or other type of WCD) from the one or more interfering nodes. Theinterference level refers to the interference experienced by the UE atits receiver caused by the interfering node. Examples of the metricsinclude radio node transmit power, received signal quality at the UE(e.g. RSRQ measured on interfering node), utilization of radio resources(e.g. usage of physical resource blocks, resource element, etc.) at theradio node, transmission intensity of data (e.g., PDSCH) and/or controlchannel (e.g. PDCCH, PHICH, etc.) from the interfering node, etc. Thenetwork node can obtain one or more of these measurements from theinterfering node and/or from the UE (e.g. RSRQ, CSI reports, SINR,etc.).

The signal load or interference level can be estimated over a certaintime period (e.g., 200 ms). The determined load or interference can thenbe expressed in one of L pre-defined levels (e.g., in 2 levels such aslow and high or 3 levels such as low, medium, high or in 5 levels suchas very low, low, medium, high and very high, or in any other number oflevels). In one example, a low loadmay correspond to the load of one ormore physical channels (e.g. PDSCH, PDCCH, PHICH etc) occupying lessthan 30% of resources (e.g. less than 30% of available physical resourceblocks (PRBs) in the interfering cell) and a high load may correspond tothe load of one or more physical channels occupying 30% or more ofresources. In another example, low load corresponds to the averageresource utilization (e.g. PRB usage) or transmit power usage in aninterfering node being below 30%, whereas 30% or more corresponds tohigh load. Similarly, in a 3-level metric system for measuring physicalchannel load or interference, the low, medium, and high loads maycorrespond to average resource usage of less than 30%, from 30% to 70%,and more than 70%, respectively. In yet another example, the low,medium, and high load in an interfering node can be determined based onsignal quality at the UE (e.g. RSRQ, SINR, etc) corresponding to lessthan −15 dB, from −15 dB to −10 dB, and more than −10 dB, respectively.

In yet another example, the low, medium, and high interference levelscan be determined based on the activity of a set of the strongestaggressor cells (e.g., the first two strongest aggressor cells).

For instance, low interference might correspond to the case where noneof the two strongest aggressor cells are transmitting physical channels.Medium interference might correspond to the case where only the secondstrongest aggressor is transmitting physical channels, while highinterference might correspond to the case where both strongest aggressorcells are transmitting physical channels. The condition may involvechecking all interfering nodes or the N strongest interfering nodes ofthe UE. In case of multiple interfering nodes, the load level can bedetermined based on a statistical function e.g., average of loads in allcells, xth percentile of load in all cells, etc.

Physical Signal Relation Between Serving/Measured and Interfering Nodes:

In one example, this condition refers to the relation between a timeand/or frequency of the physical signals such as reference signals usedat the serving cell and a time and/or frequency of the physical signalsat at least one interfering node. For example, this condition canindicate whether a certain type of physical signals such as CRStransmitted by the serving or measured cell and interfering cell arecolliding or non-colliding. The collision of the CRS occurs when the REscontaining the CRS in the serving and interfering cells overlap in bothtime and frequency. The collision of the CRS can be avoided by shiftingthe CRS in frequency domain between serving and interfering nodes. Thismay be done during network planning and is therefore not changedfrequently. The information about physical signal relation betweendifferent cells in an area may be pre-determined or provided to thenetwork node by another node (e.g., by a configuring node such as OSS,O&M, SON node, etc.) The network node based on stored or acquiredinformation from another node determines whether the physical signals(e.g. CRS) used in the serving and interfering nodes of the UE are arecolliding or not. The UE can also determine the relation betweenphysical signals used in the serving/measured cell and interfering cellduring cell search procedure or any type of measurement procedure (e.g.,when performing RSRP measurements) and can store the relation betweenthese cells. The colliding and non-colliding physical signals (e.g.,CRS) can be expressed mathematically using mod X operation as explainedwith few examples:

In case of single antenna port implementation in a radio network node,there can be 6 possible frequency shifts to avoid CRS collision. As anexample, if CRS used in cell 1 and cell 2 collide, then the relationbetween their physical cell IDs (PCI) #1 and #2 can be expressed as mod6 operation. In another example, if CRS used in cell 2 and cell 4 do notcollide, then the relation between their physical cell IDs (PCI) #3 and#4 can also be expressed as mod 6 operation. This is expressedmathematically as follows:

Colliding CRS between cell 1 and cell 2 for single antenna port:(PCI_(cell1)-PCI_(cell12))mod 6=0

Non-colliding CRS between cell3 and cell4 for single antenna port:(PCI_(cell3) PCI_(cell4))mod 6≠0

In case of MIMO (e.g., two antennas) in the radio network node, 3possible frequency shifts to avoid CRS collision are possible. As anexample, if CRS used in cell 1 and cell 2 collide then the relationbetween their physical cell IDs (PCI) #1 and #2 can be expressed as amod 3 operation. In another example, if CRS used in cell 2 and cell 4 donot collide then the relation between their physical cell IDs (PCI) #3and #4 can also be expressed as mod 3 operation. These examples are alsoexpressed mathematically below:

Colliding CRS between cell 1 and cell 2 for 2-antenna port:(PCI_(cell1)-PCI_(cell2))mod 3=0

Non-colliding CRS between cell 3 and cell 4 for 2-antenna port:(PCI_(cell3)-PCI_(cell4))mod 3≠0

Selection Based on Additional Conditions

In an embodiment, the minimum conditions used for selecting the UEreceiver configuration are the physical channel load and the relationbetween physical signals from the serving and interfering nodes. The UEor network node may further evaluate one or more additional orsupplementary conditions in order to further enhance the selection ofthe UE receiver configuration for applying the interference mitigation.For example, the UE or network node can use one or a plurality ofpre-defined lookup tables mapping the evaluated additional one or moreconditions and the UE receiver type to be selected.

Non-limiting examples of these additional conditions are: UE location inthe serving cell; UE battery life or power consumption; Low Interferencetime-frequency resource configuration (e.g., restricted subframe patternin heterogeneous network).

Non-limiting examples of mapping one of the additional conditions to theUE receiver configuration or of mapping a combination of the additionalconditions to the UE receiver configuration to be selected are shown intables 2, 3, 4 and 5. Depending upon the value of the evaluatedadditional conditions, the look up tables in some embodiments may alsoresult in a selection that uses no UE receiver configuration forinterference mitigation. For example, if the UE is close to serving celland/or UE battery life is very low (e.g., less than 20%), then adecision may be made for the UE to not apply interference mitigation tomitigate interference caused by one or more interfering nodes.

TABLE 2 Selection of receiver configuration based on one additionalcriterion (UE location) UE location in serving cell Cell Range Expansion(CRE) Inner part of cell Cell edge zone No selection of 1^(st), FollowSelect 1^(st) receiver 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) receiver mapping basedconfiguration. For configuration. on minimum determine whetherconditions the 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) (e.g., follow receiver table 1).configuration should be selected, follow mapping based on minimumconditions (e.g., table 1).

TABLE 3 Selection of receiver configuration based on one additionalcriterion (UE battery life or power consumption) UE battery life orpower consumption Very Low Low Medium or high No selection of Select1^(st) receiver Follow mapping 1^(st), 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) configuration orbased on receiver follow mapping minimum configuration based onconditions (e.g., minimum table 1). conditions (e.g., table 1).

TABLE 4 Selection of receiver configuration based on combination ofadditional conditions UE location in serving cell UE battery life orInner part of power consumption cell Cell edge CRE zone Very Low Noselection No selection of 1^(st), 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) of 1^(st), 2^(nd) orreceiver configuration 3^(rd) receiver configuration Medium No selectionFollow Select 1^(st) of 1^(st), 2^(nd) or mapping receiver 3^(rd)receiver based on configuration. configuration minimum For 2^(nd) or3^(rd) conditions receiver (e.g., table configuration 1). follow mappingbased on minimum conditions (e.g., table 1). High No selection FollowSelect 1^(st) of 1^(st), 2^(nd) or mapping receiver 3^(rd) receiverbased on configuration. configuration minimum For determining or select1^(st) conditions whether 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) UE receiver (e.g., tablereceiver configuration 1). configuration should be selected, followmapping based on minimum conditions (e.g., table 1).

TABLE 5 Selection of receiver configuration based on combination ofadditional conditions UE battery life or UE location in serving cellpower Inner part of consumption cell Cell edge CRE zone Very Low Noselection Follow mapping based on of 1^(st), 2^(nd) or minimumconditions (e.g. 3^(rd) receiver table 1) but apply inter-cellconfiguration interference mitigation to signal from the strongestinterfering node. Medium No selection Follow Select 1^(st) of 1^(st),2^(nd) or mapping receiver 3^(rd) receiver based on configuration.configuration minimum For 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) conditions receiver (e.g.,table configuration 1). follow mapping based on minimum conditions(e.g., table 1). High No selection Follow Select 1^(st) of 1^(st),2^(nd) or mapping receiver 3^(rd) receiver based on configuration.configuration minimum For 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) or select 1^(st) conditionsreceiver UE receiver (e.g., table configuration configuration 1). followmapping based on minimum conditions (e.g., table 1).

TABLE 6 Selection of receiver configuration based on combination ofadditional conditions (UE battery life or power consumption, UE locationin serving cell and low Interference time-frequency resource isconfigured) UE location in serving cell UE battery life or Inner part ofpower consumption cell Cell edge CRE zone Very Low No selection ofSelect 1^(st) receiver 1^(st), 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) configuration in lowreceiver Interference time- configuration frequency resources. Medium Noselection of For remaining time- l^(st), 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) frequencyresources receiver follow table 5. configuration High No selection of1^(st), 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) receiver configuration or select 1^(st) UEreceiver configuration

Although the above conditions are referred to as additional conditions,in some embodiments one or more of the conditions may replace thephysical channel load and/or physical signal relation as a minimumcondition.

The method in the UE and/or network node of determining the additionalconditions is described below.

UE Location with Respect to the Interfering Node:

The UE or network node may use UE location as one of the conditions forselecting the UE receiver configuration for interference mitigation. TheUE location can be the location only with respect to the serving node(e.g, RNN 104) or measured node (e.g., RNN 105), only with respect tothe interfering node, or a UE location relative to both serving/measuredcell and interfering node.

The UE location enables the UE or the network node to determine theseverity of the interfering signals at the UE received from theinterfering nodes. For example, if the UE is at the cell border regionof the serving cell, then the network node may infer that the UE is moreseverely affected by the interference from the interfering nodescompared to a situation in which the UE is in an inner region of theserving cell. In this case, the network node may select the UE receiverconfiguration according to the minimum conditions (e.g. follow table 1).If, on the other hand, the UE is close to serving cell or measured cellbut far from the interfering node, then the UE or network node maydecide to not select any of the UE receiver configurations forinterference mitigation, as shown in Table 2. In this case the UE mayhave to use a baseline receiver without any need for network assistedinterference mitigation. The UE location can be expressed in terms of aserving signal measurement result such as signal strength, geometryfactor (e.g., ratio of serving cell received power to interference),serving cell SINR, relative signal measurement between serving/measuredand interfering nodes, etc. The network node can acquire radiomeasurement results (e.g. relative RSRQ or RSRP between serving andinterfering nodes) from the UE.

The UE or network node may determine the UE location based on one ormore of the following: radio measurements performed by the UE; and UElocation or positioning (e.g., based on existing positioning method suchas E-CID measurements such as UE Rx-Tx time difference, A-GNSS, OTDOA,etc.). UE measurements and the determination of UE position is discussedbelow.

A. Radio Measurements

1. UE Measurements

The RSRP and RSRQ are the two existing UE radio measurements used for atleast RRM such as for mobility, which include mobility in RRC connectedstate as well as in RRC idle state. The RSRP and RSRQ are also used forother purposes such as for enhanced cell ID positioning, minimization ofdrive test (MDT) etc. The cell identification, radio link monitoring(e.g. out of sync and in sync detection) are also type of UE radiomeasurements.

The measurements can be absolute or relative. An absolute measurement isperformed on signals from one cell e.g. serving cell or neighboringcell. A relative measurement is the relative difference between themeasurement performed on one cell and on another cell e.g. betweenserving cell measurement and neighboring cell measurement.

The channel state information (CSI) measurements performed by the UE onserving cell are used for scheduling, link adaptation etc by thenetwork. Examples of CSI measurements are CQI, PMI, RI etc.

2. Radio Network Node Measurements

In order to support different functions such as mobility (e.g. cellselection, handover etc), positioning a UE, link adaption, scheduling,load balancing, admission control, interference management, interferencemitigation etc, the radio network node also performs radio measurementson signals transmitted and/or received by the radio network node.Examples of such measurements are SNR, SINR, received interference power(RIP), BLER, propagation delay between UE and itself, transmit carrierpower, transmit power of specific signals (e.g. Tx power of referencesignals), positioning measurements etc.

B. Location Services in Cellular (3GPP) Networks

The position of the target device is determined by using one or morepositioning measurements, which can be performed by a suitable measuringnode or the target device.

In LTE, the positioning node (aka E-SMLC or location server) configuresthe target device (e.g. UE), eNode B or a radio node dedicated forpositioning measurements (e.g. LMU) to perform one or more positioningmeasurements depending upon the positioning method. The positioningmeasurements are used by the target device or by a measuring node or bythe positioning node to determine the location of the target device. InLTE the positioning node communicates with UE using LTE positioningprotocol (LPP) and with eNode B using LTE positioning protocol annex(LPPa).

The well-known positioning methods used in cellular systems (e.g. LTE)are described below:

Satellite based methods: In this case the positioning measurements areperformed by the target device on signals received from the navigationalsatellites are used for determining the target device's location. Forexample either GNSS or A-GNSS (e.g. A-GPS, Galileo, COMPASS, GANSS etc)measurements are used for determining the UE position.

OTDOA: This method uses UE measurements related to time difference ofarrival of signals from radio nodes (e.g. reference signal received timedifference (RSTD) measurement in LTE) for determining UE position in LTEor SFN-SFN type 2 in HSPA. To speed up OTDOA measurements and also toimprove their accuracy, the positioning server provides OTDOA assistanceinformation to the target device. The OTDOA can also be UE based or UEassisted positioning method. In the former the target device determinesits location itself whereas in the latter the positioning server (e.g.E-SMLC) uses the received OTDOA measurements from the target device todetermine the location of the target device.

UTDOA: It uses measurements done at a measuring node (e.g. locationmeasurement unit (LMU)) on signals transmitted by the target device. TheLMU measurements from multiple LMUs are used by the location server(e.g. E-SMLC in LTE) for determining the position of the target device.

Enhanced cell ID (E-CID): It uses one or more radio measurements fordetermining the target device's position. The E-CID method uses at leastthe cell ID of a serving and/or a neighboring cell and at least oneadditional radio measurements which can be performed by the targetdevice or by a radio node. For example E-CID method typically uses anycombination of cell ID and radio measurements such as UE Rx-Tx timedifference, BS Rx-Tx time difference, timing advanced (TA) measured bythe BS, LTE RSRP and/or RSRQ, HSPA CPICH measurements (CPICH RSCP and/orCPICH Ec/No), angle of arrival (AoA) measured by the BS on UEtransmitted signals etc for determining the position of the targetdevice. The TA measurement is done using either UE Rx-Tx time differenceor BS Rx-Tx time difference or both.

Hybrid methods: It relies on positioning measurements related to morethan one positioning methods for determining the position of the targetdevice. For example the hybrid method may use A-GNSS measurements andOTDOA RSTD measurements for determining the position of the targetdevice.

UE Battery Life or Power Consumption:

Inter-cell interference mitigation requires power consumption, memoryand processing at the UE. Therefore, to avoid UE battery drainage, theUE or network node may selectively decide whether to activate theinterference mitigation and also selects the appropriate UE receiverconfiguration for doing so. For example, if the UE battery life is belowa threshold, then the network node or UE may not select any of the UEinterference mitigation receiver configuration at the UE, as shown intable 3. If the UE battery life is not below a threshold, the networknode or UE selects the UE receiver configuration for interferencemitigation at the UE according to pre-defined rules based on minimumconditions (e.g., according to mapping in the lookup table 1).

The network can determine the UE battery life by, for example,explicitly receiving the current UE battery level (e.g. absolute valuein terms of watts, discrete power levels (e.g., charge levels) such aslow, medium and high, etc.) from the UE. The network can also implicitlydetermine the state of the UE battery life, for example by observing theUE activity level over the past time period (T₀). For instance, if theUE is receiving data over the last certain number of frames (e.g.100-200) then the network may implicitly assume that the UE battery lifeis low; otherwise, it may assume the battery life if medium or high.

Low Interference Time-Frequency Resource Configuration:

In an embodiment, if the UE is receiving signals from a cell (e.g.,serving or neighbor cells) using time-frequency resources (e.g.subframe) with no or low interference, then only the 1^(st) receiverconfiguration is selected and none of the 2^(nd) or 3^(rd) receiverconfiguration is selected. In a heterogeneous network, the UE may beconfigured with one or more receivers to perform measurements andreceive data in victim cells (e.g. cell served by a low power node) inlow interference time-frequency resources. An example of such lowinterference resource includes patterns of restricted subframes (e.g.,resource restricted measurement patterns for serving (or PCell) and forneighbor cells). The aggressor cell is configured with a transmitpattern (e.g., almost blank subframe (ABS)). Therefore in this case theinterference from physical channels (e.g., PDSCH, PDCCH, etc) inaggressor cells is very low or non-existence at the victim UE. The UE ornetwork nodes may be aware of the restricted subframe pattern configuredat the UE. Therefore the UE or network node can use this criterion(e.g., whether UE uses such pattern or not) to select the appropriatereceiver configuration. The UE may for example use or can be configuredby the network node to use the 1^(st) receiver configuration in lowinterference time-frequency resources. In normal subframes (e.g. nonrestricted subframes) the receiver configuration can be selected basedon other conditions as mentioned above. The selection based on lowfrequency time-resource configuration is shown in table 6.

WCD (e.g., UE) Selecting WCD Receiver Configuration:

In one embodiment, the WCD (e.g., UE) selects one of the WCD (e.g., UE)receiver configurations for receiving a desired signal and mitigatingthe interfering signals according to one or more conditions as describedabove. It may be pre-defined that the UE is allowed to select thereceiver configuration according to one or more pre-defined conditions.The UE may also perform the selection of the receiver configurationautonomously or only when explicitly permitted by the network node.

WCD (e.g., UE) signaling information related to selected receiverconfiguration to network node:

In one embodiment, the WCD (e.g., UE) upon selecting one of the WCDreceiver configurations or statistics of the selected WCD receiverconfigurations over certain time period (e.g. during a session, overlast M number of radio frames or TTI), may signal the informationrelated to the said selecting the WCD receiver configurations to thenetwork node. The UE may also inform the network of the conditions usedfor selecting the UE receiver configurations at different times.

If the UE is not using or has not selected any of interferencemitigation receiver configuration, then the UE can also indicate this tothe network node. The UE may also explicitly indicate that it is using abaseline receiver and so it does not need any assistance information forassisting interference mitigation.

Network Node Selecting WCD (e.g., UE) Receiver Configuration

In one embodiment the network node (e.g. UE-serving network node)selects one of the UE receiver configurations for enabling the UE toreceive the desired signal and mitigate the interfering signalsaccording to one or more conditions as described above. It may also bepre-defined that the UE is not allowed to autonomously select thereceiver configuration. Instead it may be pre-defined that the networknode will select the UE receiver configuration according to one or morepre-defined conditions and configure the UE with the selectedconfiguration. It may also be pre-defined that the network node willconfigure the UE with one or more conditions or associated values (e.g.,thresholds for conditions) and then the UE will use the configuredinformation to autonomously select the UE receiver configuration out ofthe pre-defined configurations.

In one embodiment, it may also be pre-defined that the UE may select andrecommend UE receiver configurations based on one or more pre-definedrules and/or conditions and inform the recommendation results to thenetwork node. The network will also determine the UE receiverconfiguration and also take into account the UE recommended receiverconfiguration for final selection of the UE receiver configuration.

In one embodiment, the network, upon selecting the UE receiverconfiguration based on one or more of the principles or rules describedabove, configures the UE with the UE receiver configuration and/orassociated parameters (e.g., threshold values such as load or signalquality levels corresponding to low, medium and high, etc.).

UE Signaling Capability Associated with UE Receiver Configuration toNetwork Node

According to this embodiment, the UE which supports such signalingcapability may inform the network node that for mitigating interferencefrom one or more interfering node it is capable of selecting andadapting its receiver configuration according to one of the first UEreceiver configuration, second UE receiver configuration and third UEreceiver configuration mentioned above, and to perform the selectionbased on one or more conditions, such as those described above.

The capability may also include one or more of the following additionalinformation and parameters, such as a UE that is capable of adapting itsreceiver configuration:

i) autonomously, based on pre-defined rules or based on instructions orconfiguration received from the network node;

ii) for all or subset of certain type and/or number of physical channelsand physical signals used in a serving/measured cell;

iii) provided only certain types and/or number of physical channels andphysical signals are used in interfering nodes;

iv) for all or selected frequency bands;

v) for up to a certain (e.g., predefined) number of interfering nodes;

vi) only in a specific deployment scenario (e.g., CoMP, Heterogeneousnetwork, etc.);

vii) which is associated with specific frequency ranges (e.g.frequencies below 2 GHz) or frequency bands (e.g. specific pre-definedband numbers);

viii) for one or more than one carrier frequency (e.g. primary componentcarrier and at least one secondary component carrier) in carrieraggregation;

ix) on more than one radio link in multiflow or CoMP scenario on acarrier;

x) on more than one carrier frequency (e.g. primary component carrierand at least one secondary component carrier) in a combined carrieraggregation and multiflow or CoMP scenario;

xi) only when it receives from the network node the assistanceinformation related to physical channel and physical signalconfiguration used in the interfering nodes;

xii) without requiring any assistance information (e.g., withoutscheduling information of DL transmissions in interfering nodes).

The UE may send the capability information to the network node in any ofthe following manner: i) proactive reporting without receiving anyexplicit request from the network node (e.g. reporting to a serving orany target network node); and ii) reporting upon receiving any explicitrequest from the network node (e.g. serving or any target network node).The explicit request can be sent to the UE by the network node at anytime or at any specific occasion. For example, the request for thecapability reporting can be sent to the UE during initial setup or aftera cell change (e.g. handover, RRC connection re-establishment, RRCconnection release with redirection, PCell change in CA, PCC change inPCC, etc.).

In case of proactive reporting, the UE may report its capability duringone or more of the following occasions: i) during initial setup or callsetup (e.g., when establishing the RRC connection); and ii) during cellchange (e.g., handover, primary carrier change in multi-carrieroperation, PCell change in multi-carrier operation, RRCre-establishment, RRC connection release with redirection, etc.).

The acquired capability information may be used by the serving networknode for taking one or more radio operation tasks or actions.

The network node (e.g. eNode B, serving RNC, BS, Node B, BS, etc.) usesat least the received UE capability information in order to determinewhether to select the UE receiver configuration enabling the UE formitigating interference from an interfering node. The network node mayalso decide which parameter values (e.g. thresholds, conditions, etc.)to be configured at the UE. The network node uses suitable conditionsfor making this decision in order to configure the UE to use a certaintype of receiver as elaborated above.

In an embodiment, the network node may also forward the received UEcapability information to another network node (e.g., to a neighboringradio network node, such as a SON, O&M, OSS, etc.). This forwarding willavoid the need for the UE to again report its capability to a newserving radio node after the cell changes (e.g., after handover). Inthis way signaling overheads can be reduced and the target radio nodecan quickly select the appropriate receiver type. The network node mayalso store the capability information of a plurality of UEs and use thedata for network planning and tuning of network parameters.

Network Node Configuring UE with Assistance Information for InterferenceMitigation

In an embodiment, the UE, after selecting the appropriate UE receiverconfiguration autonomously, based on a pre-defined rule, based onconfiguration from the network node, or any combination thereof asdescribed in preceding sections, performs the interference mitigation.The interference mitigation step may require assistance information fromthe network depending upon the selected receiver configuration.

Therefore the network node upon receiving an indication from the UEabout the selected receiver configuration or upon selection of the saidreceiver configuration for the UE may create assistance information. Theassistance information is sent by the network node to the UE. Thenetwork node may also configure another network node (e.g., interferingnodes) with appropriate parameters depending upon the selected receiverconfiguration, examples of which are provided below.

EXAMPLES

(1) In order to assist the UE to mitigate interference by using theselected first UE receiver configuration (i.e. mitigate interferencecaused by physical signals from interfering nodes), the network nodedoes not need to provide any information related to the physicalresources used for downlink transmissions in an interfering node.However the network node may still send at least the cell IDs of theinterfering nodes. Further, the network node may at least send anindication on a number of interferers (e.g. strongest neighbor cells)whose interference is to be mitigated by the victim UE. The network nodemay also send information about physical signal configuration such asantenna configuration (e.g. number of CRS antenna ports), MBSFNconfiguration (e.g. subframes used for MBSFN in a frame), etc. The UEmay use this information to identify the strongest interferer and applyinterference mitigation.

(2) In order to assist the UE to mitigate interference by using theselected second UE receiver configuration (i.e. mitigate interferencecaused by physical channels from interfering nodes) the network nodeprovides one or a plurality of information related to the physicalresources (e.g. PDSCH) used for downlink transmissions in one or aplurality of interfering nodes. In one example, the network nodeprovides the UE with the dynamic information which comprises schedulingof resources in one or more interfering nodes in every transmission timeinterval (TTI) or certain number of TTIs. In another example, thenetwork node provides the UE with the semi-static information whichcomprises set of resources which can be scheduled in one or moreinterfering nodes. These two cases are further illustrated below:

The dynamic assistance information depends upon the type of physicalchannel or physical signal (e.g. HS-SCCH, HS-DSCH, A-GCH, E-ROCH, BCH,PDSCH in LTE, PDCCH in LTE, etc) whose interference needs to bemitigated from the interfering nodes. The information can be providedfor one or a plurality of interfering nodes for every TTI or for certainconsecutive TTIs to the UE. Typically the assistance information mayinclude cell IDs of interfering nodes, UE ID (e.g. C-RNTI), antennaconfiguration or antenna transmission mode used by the UE, physicalchannel resources used for each UE whose downlink transmissions in theinterfering node cause interference to victim UEs in a victim cell. Thephysical resources may comprise one or more of the physical resourceblock (PRB) allocation in LTE, CDMA or OVSF channelization code in CDMA,number of channelization codes, transport format, or modulation codingscheme (MCS), etc. In order to send this information to the UE thenetwork node acquires this information from the interfering nodes.

In the semi-static case the UE is configured with a potential set ofphysical channel resources (e.g. a set of transport format/MCS,channelization codes, resource blocks, etc.) which can be used fordownlink transmissions in the interfering node. The UE therefore needsto blindly decode the actual physical channel used in the interferingnodes out of the configured set. The configured set is thereforetypically a reduced set of all possible channel configurations. Thisrequires that the resource assignment in the interfering nodes to itsown UEs is limited to the set of physical resources configured at thevictim UE. This puts constraints on the network in terms of schedulingand resource assignment in interfering nodes. Therefore the network nodecoordinates with the interfering nodes to obtain the information aboutthe semi-static configuration that can be used or currently used in thesaid interfering nodes.

(3) In order to assist the UE to mitigate interference by using theselected third UE receiver configuration (i.e. mitigate interferencecaused by physical signals and physical channels from interfering nodes)the network node may provide the assistance information corresponding tothe first and second UE receiver configurations as described above.

(4) In case none of the three UE receiver configuration is used by theUE then the network node does not need to provide any assistanceinformation.

WCD (e.g., UE) Adapting Receiver Configuration

The WCD (e.g., UE), after selecting the receiver configuration (e.g.,autonomously, based on pre-defined rule, based on configurationperformed by the network node or based on any combination thereof) asdescribed herein and after receiving the assistance information (ifneeded) as described above, applies the selected receiver configurationfor mitigating the interference caused by one or more interfering nodes.The UE can assess the need for adapting to a new receiver configurationafter certain time period (e.g. after M number of TTIs or J number ofradio frames, such as every 10 frames or 100 ms). The UE may receiveupdated or latest assistance information from the network node even ifthe UE receiver configuration is the same (e.g., since dynamic resourceassignment is changed every TTI).

If the receiver configuration is changed by itself or by the networknode, then the assistance information sent to the UE may also beupdated. For example, the UE may obtain additional assistanceinformation if, for example, the first receiver configuration is changedto the third receiver configuration, and may obtain reduced assistanceinformation if the third receiver configuration is changed to secondreceiver configuration.

Network Node Signaling Information Related to Receiver ConfigurationSelection to Another Network Node

The network node may maintain and store information or statisticsrelated to the UE receiver configuration (e.g., that the UE isconfigured to the first, second, or third receiver configurations, or isconfigured to perform no network assisted interference mitigation)selected and used by the UE for mitigating interference from one or moreinterfering nodes as described above. The statistics or the stored datacan be forwarded (e.g., signaled) to other network nodes. Examples ofother network nodes are neighboring base stations (e.g. eNB sending toother, neighboring eNBs over an X2 interface), a positioning node(E-SMLC in LTE), a third node, a MDT node, a SON node, an O&M node, anOSS node, a network monitoring node, a network planning node, etc.

The network node forwarding the information or the other network nodesreceiving the information may use this information for one or morenetwork management tasks. Examples of such tasks are configuration ofradio network parameters (e.g. maximum output power of base station,deployment of new radio nodes, location of low power nodes withincoverage of high power nodes, etc.) to enhance the network performance.For example, if certain receiver configuration is more commonly usedthen the network node may configure the network parameters which mayenhance the performance of that receiver configuration.

Example Process

Referring now to FIG. 2, FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a process,according to one embodiment, for mitigating interference experienced bywireless communication device (e.g., a UE 102) from a signal transmitted(e.g., broadcasted) by an interfering node (e.g., interfering node 106).

The process may begin in step 202, in which a communication apparatus(e.g., the UE 102 or network node 104, 108, or 105) determinesinformation related to the interfering node 106.

In one embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 3, determining informationrelated to the interfering node includes one or more of i) step 302 andii) step 304. In step 302, the communication apparatus determines arelationship between a first signal transmitted by a radio network node(e.g., RNN 104 or RNN 105) and a second signal transmitted by theinterfering node. In step 304, the communication apparatus determines aload of the interfering node 106.

Returning to FIG. 2, at step 204 the communication apparatus (102, 104,105, or 108) selects, based at least in part on the determinedinformation related to the interfering node (106), a WCD receiverconfiguration from a set of available WCD receiver configurations thatcomprises i) a first WCD receiver configuration that mitigates onlyinterference caused by physical signals transmitted by the interferingnode (106) and ii) a second WCD receiver configuration that mitigatesonly interference caused by physical channels transmitted by theinterfering node (106).

In an embodiment, the set of WCD receiver configurations furthercomprises a third WCD receiver configuration that mitigates interferencecaused by both physical signals and physical channels transmitted by theinterfering node (106).

In one embodiment, the communication apparatus performs step 206, inwhich it determines information related to the WCD. The informationincludes, for example, information related to a location of the WCDwithin a cell, information related to an amount of power consumed by theWCD, information related to the status of a battery that provides powerto the WCD, and/or information related to low interference physicalresource configuration. The selection of the WCD receiver configurationmay be based at least in part on the determined information related tothe WCD.

In one embodiment where the WCD selects the WCD receiver configuration,the WCD may mitigate the interference by using the selected receiverconfiguration without requiring any information from any network node.In a second embodiment where the WCD selects the WCD receiverconfiguration, the UE may mitigate the interference using the selectedreceiver configuration and assistance information received from anetwork node.

If the network node selects the WCD receiver configuration, then thenetwork node transmits to the WCD information identifying the selectedWCD receiver configuration. In response to receiving the message, theWCD uses the identified WCD receiver configuration.

In one embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 4, the WCD may transmitinformation to the network node, which may use the information inselecting the WCD receiver configuration. For example, in step 402, theWCD may transmit to the network node information about a first selectionof the WCD receiver configuration. The first selection may be, forinstance, a recommendation for approval, denial, or alteration by thenetwork node. In some cases, if the network node chooses to not adoptthe recommendation, it may send back a second WCD receiver configurationto the WCD. In step 404, the communication apparatus transmitscapability information to the network side. The capability informationindicates that the WCD is capable of selecting between at least thefirst WCD receiver configuration and the second WCD receiverconfiguration. This information may also facilitate a network node'sselection of a WCD receiver configuration.

In one embodiment, prior to the apparatus performing step 204, theapparatus determines whether a set of one or more conditions is true andperforms step 204 only if the determined set of conditions is true. Inone embodiment, determining whether the set of one or more conditions istrue comprises: determining whether the WCD's battery life is greaterthan a threshold and/or determining whether a WCD location condition istrue.

In one embodiment, determining whether a UE location condition is truecomprises determining whether or not the UE is located within an innerpart of a serving cell.

First Example of Communication Apparatus for Mitigating Interference

FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of an example communication apparatus102 for mitigating interference experienced by a wireless communicationdevice. In the example, the communication apparatus 102 is a WCD. Asshown in FIG. 5, communication apparatus 102 includes: a data processingsystem (DPS) 502, which may include one or more processors (P) 555(e.g., microprocessors) and/or one or more circuits, such as anapplication specific integrated circuit (ASIC), Field-programmable gatearrays (FPGAs), etc.; a wireless transceiver 505, connected to anantenna 522, for receiving information from, and transmittinginformation to, network nodes (e.g., RNNs 104, 105, 106); a data storagesystem 506, which may include one or more computer-readable data storagemediums, such as non-transitory memory unit (e.g., hard drive, flashmemory, optical disk, etc.) and/or volatile storage apparatuses (e.g.,dynamic random access memory (DRAM)).

In embodiments where data processing system 502 includes a processor 555(e.g., a microprocessor), a computer program product 533 may beprovided, which computer program product includes: computer readableprogram code 543 (e.g., instructions), which implements a computerprogram, stored on a computer readable medium 542 of data storage system506, such as, but not limited, to magnetic media (e.g., a hard disk),optical media (e.g., a DVD), memory devices (e.g., random accessmemory), etc. In some embodiments, computer readable program code 543 isconfigured such that, when executed by data processing system 502, code543 causes the data processing system 502 to perform steps describedherein (e.g., step shown in FIG. 2).

In some embodiments, communication apparatus 102 is configured toperform steps described above without the need for code 543. Forexample, data processing system 502 may consist merely of specializedhardware, such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits(ASICs). Hence, the features of the present disclosure described abovemay be implemented in hardware and/or software. For example, in someembodiments, the functional components of communication apparatus 102described above may be implemented by data processing system 502executing program code 543, by data processing system 502 operatingindependent of any computer program code 543, or by any suitablecombination of hardware and/or software.

In another embodiment, communication apparatus 102 further includes: 1)a display screen 523 coupled to the data processing system 502 thatenables the data processing system 502 to display information to a userof communication apparatus 102; 2) a speaker 524 coupled to the dataprocessing system 502 that enables the data processing system 502 tooutput audio to the user of communication apparatus 102; and 3) amicrophone 525 coupled to the data processing system 502 that enablesthe data processing system 502 to receive audio from the user.

Second Example of Apparatus for Mitigating Interference

FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an example communication apparatusfor mitigating interference experienced by a wireless communicationdevice. In the example, the apparatus is a network node, which could bea radio network node or a core network node. As shown in FIG. 6, thenetwork node includes: a data processing system (DPS) 602, which mayinclude one or more processors (P) 655 (e.g., microprocessors) and/orone or more circuits, such as an application specific integrated circuit(ASIC), Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.; a networkinterface 603 for connecting the network node to core network 110; adata storage system 606, which may include one or more computer-readabledata storage mediums, such as non-transitory memory unit (e.g., harddrive, flash memory, optical disk, etc.) and/or volatile storageapparatuses (e.g., dynamic random access memory (DRAM)). In the casethat network node is a radio network node, then, as shown in FIG. 6, thenetwork node further includes a wireless transceiver 605, connected toan antenna 622, for receiving information from, and transmittinginformation to, UEs.

In embodiments where data processing system 602 includes a processor 655(e.g., a microprocessor), a computer program product 633 may beprovided, which computer program product includes: computer readableprogram code 643 (e.g., instructions), which implements a computerprogram, stored on a computer readable medium 642 of data storage system606, such as, but not limited, to magnetic media (e.g., a hard disk),optical media (e.g., a DVD), memory devices (e.g., random accessmemory), etc. In some embodiments, computer readable program code 643 isconfigured such that, when executed by data processing system 602, code643 causes the data processing system 602 to perform steps describedherein.

In some embodiments, network node is configured to perform stepsdescribed above without the need for code 643. For example, dataprocessing system 602 may consist merely of specialized hardware, suchas one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Hence,the features of the present disclosure described above may beimplemented in hardware and/or software. For example, in someembodiments, the functional components of network node described abovemay be implemented by data processing system 602 executing program code643, by data processing system 602 operating independent of any computerprogram code 643, or by any suitable combination of hardware and/orsoftware.

The UE is able to use the most appropriate combination of receivers tomitigate the interference caused by aggressor or interfering nodes.

The UE only uses more complex receivers when they are needed. This inturn reduces the UE complexity, enhanced UE battery life and reducesprocessing at the UE.

FIG. 7 illustrates various components of an apparatus (e.g., acommunication apparatus) for mitigating interference experienced by awireless communication device, WCD. The components include: a) means for(702) determining information related to an interfering node; b) meansfor (704) selecting, based at least in part on the determinedinformation related to the interfering node, a WCD receiverconfiguration from a set of available WCD receiver configurations thatcomprises: i) a first WCD receiver configuration that mitigates onlyinterference caused by physical signals transmitted by the interferingnode and ii) a second WCD receiver configuration that mitigates onlyinterference caused by physical channels transmitted by the interferingnode; c) means for (706) determining information related to the WCD,which comprises one or more of: i) information related to a location ofthe WCD within a cell, ii) information related to an amount of powerconsumed by the WCD, iii) information related to the status of a batterythat provides power to the WCD, and iv) information related to lowinterference physical resources configuration; d) means for (708)transmitting capability information to a network node, wherein thecapability information indicates that the WCD is capable of selectingbetween at least the first WCD receiver configuration and the second WCDreceiver configuration.

While various aspects and embodiments of the present disclosure havebeen described above, it should be understood that they have beenpresented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadthand scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by any of theabove-described exemplary embodiments. Moreover, any combination of theelements described in this disclosure in all possible variations thereofis encompassed by the disclosure unless otherwise indicated herein orotherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Additionally, while the processes described herein and illustrated inthe drawings are shown as a sequence of steps, this was done solely forthe sake of illustration. Accordingly, it is contemplated that somesteps may be added, some steps may be omitted, the order of the stepsmay be re-arranged, and some steps may be performed in parallel.

ABBREVIATIONS

BS Base Station

CID Cell Identity

CRS Cell-specific Reference Signal

DAS Distributed Antenna System

DL Downlink

DMRS Demodulation Reference Signal

eICIC Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination

ICIC Inter-Cell Interference Coordination

ID Identity

L1 Layer 1

L2 Layer 2

LTE Long Term Evolution

MAC Medium Access Control

OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing

PBCH Physical Broadcast Channel

PCFICH Physical Control format Indicator

PDCCH Physical Downlink Control Channel

PDSCH Physical Downlink Shared Channel

PHICH Physical Hybrid ARQ Indicator Channel

PSS Primary Synchronization Signal

RAT Radio Access Technology

RE Resource Element

RB Resource Block

RRH Remote radio head

RRM Radio Resource Management

RRU Remote radio unit

RSRQ Reference signal received quality

RSRP Reference signal received power

SFN Single Frequency Network

SRS Sounding Reference Signal

SSS Secondary Synchronization Signal

UE User Equipment

UL Uplink

RSTD Reference signal time difference

SON Self Organizing Network

RSSI Received signal strength indicator

O&M Operational and Maintenance

OSS Operational Support Systems

OTDOA Observed time difference of arrival

OVSF Orthogonal Variable Spreading Factor

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method performed by a communicationapparatus for mitigating interference experienced by a wirelesscommunication device, WCD, and caused by signals transmitted by aninterfering node, the method comprising: the communication apparatusdetermining information related to the interfering node; and thecommunication apparatus selecting, based at least in part on thedetermined information related to the interfering node, a WCD receiverconfiguration from a set of available WCD receiver configurations thatcomprises i) a first WCD receiver configuration that mitigates onlyinterference caused by physical signals transmitted by the interferingnode and ii) a second WCD receiver configuration that mitigates onlyinterference caused by physical channels transmitted by the interferingnode.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining information relatedto the interfering node includes one or more of: i) determining arelationship between a first signal transmitted by a radio network nodeand a second signal transmitted by the interfering node; and ii)determining a load of the interfering node.
 3. The method of claim 1,further comprising the communication apparatus determining informationrelated to the WCD, which comprises one or more of: i) informationrelated to a location of the WCD within a cell, ii) information relatedto an amount of power consumed by the WCD, iii) information related tothe status of a battery that provides power to the WCD, and iv)information related to low interference physical resourcesconfiguration, wherein said selecting of the WCD receiver configurationis based at least in part on the determined information related to theWCD.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of WCD receiverconfigurations further comprises: a third WCD receiver configurationthat mitigates interference caused by both physical signals and physicalchannels transmitted by the interfering node.
 5. The method of claim 1,wherein the communication apparatus is the WCD.
 6. The method of claim5, further comprising transmitting to a network node information about afirst selection of the WCD receiver configuration for approval oralteration by a network node.
 7. The method of claim 5, furthercomprising transmitting capability information to a network node,wherein the capability information indicates that the WCD is capable ofselecting between at least the first WCD receiver configuration and thesecond WCD receiver configuration.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein theWCD is a user equipment, UE.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein thecommunication apparatus is a network node, and the method furthercomprises the network node providing to the WCD assistance informationto facilitate the mitigating of the interference by the WCD.
 10. Themethod of claim 9, wherein the selecting of the WCD configuration isbased on one or more of the following: i) information received from theWCD about a first selection of the WCD receiver configuration; and ii)capability information received from the WCD, wherein the capabilityinformation indicates that the WCD is capable of selecting between atleast the first WCD receiver configuration and the second WCD receiverconfiguration.
 11. The method of claim 9, further comprisingtransmitting the selected WCD receiver configuration or statistics ofthe selected WCD receiver configuration to another network node.
 12. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the interfering node is configured to processinformation in at least a first logical layer that is a physical layerand a second logical layer that is a higher logical layer than thephysical layer, wherein the physical signal includes a signal carryinginformation that originates from the physical layer, and wherein thephysical channel includes a signal carrying information that originatesfrom the higher logical layer.
 13. A communication apparatus formitigating interference experienced by a wireless communication device,WCD, and caused by signals transmitted by an interfering node, theapparatus comprising a data storage system and a data processing system,the data storage system comprising instructions executable by the dataprocessing system to: determine information related to the interferingnode; and select, based at least in part on the determined informationrelated to the interfering node, a WCD receiver configuration from a setof available WCD receiver configurations that comprises i) a first WCDreceiver configuration that mitigates only interference caused byphysical signals transmitted by the interfering node and ii) a secondWCD receiver configuration that mitigates only interference caused byphysical channels transmitted by the interfering node.
 14. Thecommunication apparatus of claim 13, wherein determining informationrelated to the interfering node includes one or more of: i) determininga relationship between a first signal transmitted by a radio networknode and a second signal transmitted by the interfering node; and ii)determining a load of the interfering node.
 15. The communicationapparatus of claim 13, wherein the apparatus is further operative todetermine information related to the WCD, which comprises one or moreof: i) information related to a location of the WCD within a cell, ii)information related to an amount of power consumed by the WCD, and iii)information related to the status of a battery that provides power tothe WCD, wherein the data processing system is configured to select theWCD receiver configuration based at least in part on the determinedinformation related to the WCD.
 16. The communication apparatus of claim13, wherein the set of WCD receiver configurations further comprises: athird WCD receiver configuration that mitigates interference caused byboth physical signals and physical channels transmitted by theinterfering node.
 17. The communication apparatus of claim 13, whereinthe apparatus is the WCD.
 18. The communication apparatus of claim 13,wherein the WCD is a user equipment, UE.
 19. The communication apparatusof claim 13, wherein the apparatus is further configured to transmit toa network node information about a first selection of the WCD receiverconfiguration for approval or alteration by a network node.
 20. Thecommunication apparatus of claim 13, wherein the apparatus is furtherconfigured to transmit capability information to the network node,wherein the capability information indicates that the WCD is capable ofselecting between at least the first WCD receiver configuration and thesecond WCD receiver configuration.
 21. The communication apparatus ofclaim 13, wherein the apparatus is a network node, and the network nodeis configured to provide to the WCD assistance information to facilitatemitigating of the interference by the WCD.
 22. The communicationapparatus of claim 21, wherein the selecting of the WCD configuration isbased on one or more of the following: i) information received from theWCD about a first selection of the WCD receiver configuration; and ii)capability information received from the WCD, wherein the capabilityinformation indicates that the WCD is capable of selecting between atleast the first WCD receiver configuration and the second WCD receiverconfiguration.
 23. The communication apparatus of claim 21, wherein theapparatus is further configured to transmit the selected WCD receiverconfiguration or statistics of the selected WCD receiver configurationto another network node.
 24. The communication apparatus of claim 13,wherein the interfering node is configured to process information in atleast a first logical layer that is a physical layer and a secondlogical layer that is a higher logical layer than the physical layer,wherein the physical signal includes a signal carrying information thatoriginates from the physical layer, and wherein the physical channelincludes a signal carrying information that originates from the higherlogical layer.